Execution Admissibility
Legal correctness is not enough. Execution must be admissible.
A legal answer can be coherent, compliant, and explainable—and still produce an outcome that should not occur.
Legal systems fail when they allow execution under incomplete state.
Execution admissibility asks one question: can this action be justified at the exact moment it becomes real?
If the answer is no, SolaceLegal does not execute. It does not proceed with a warning, approximate a permission state, or allow the user to discover the gap after consequence.
Admissibility is different from compliance.
Compliance
May describe whether a process appears aligned with rules.
Explanation
May describe why a model produced an answer.
Admissibility
Determines whether action is allowed to become real under the current state.
The boundary tightens at execution.
State sufficiency
Facts, evidence, documents, and posture must support the consequence.
Authority linkage
The governing authority must be present, relevant, and usable.
Escalation posture
When licensed review is required, the system escalates rather than acts.
No fallback
If admissibility is not satisfied, execution does not occur.